%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Supply Chain Optimization Through Cooperative Negotiation by Using Backward Scheduling
%+ Waseda University [Tokyo, Japan]
%+ Osaka Prefecture University
%A Tanimizu, Yoshitaka
%A Kanbara, Rika
%Z Part 12: Smart Supply Chain and Production in Society 5.0 Era
%< avec comité de lecture
%@ 978-3-030-85905-3
%( IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
%B IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (APMS)
%C Nantes, France
%Y Alexandre Dolgui
%Y Alain Bernard
%Y David Lemoine
%Y Gregor von Cieminski
%Y David Romero
%I Springer International Publishing
%3 Advances in Production Management Systems. Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Resilient Production Systems
%V AICT-632
%N Part III
%P 629-636
%8 2021-09-05
%D 2021
%R 10.1007/978-3-030-85906-0_68
%K Supply chain configuration;Make-to-Order (MTO) manufacturing;Job-shop scheduling;Backward scheduling;Cooperative negation
%Z Computer Science [cs]Conference papers
%X In recent years, mass customization is an important issue in manufacturing industries. They may require a make-to-order (MTO) manufacturing system throughout the whole supply chain. Our previous researches proposed a basic three-layered supply chain model for dynamic configuration of supply chains including an MTO manufacturing system. The model consists of three model components named a client, a manufacturer, and a supplier. A negotiation process among the model components were proposed in order to enter into a lot of contracts. This paper presents a cooperative negation method between a manufacturer and a supplier. The objective is to provide a negotiation method for entering into a large amount of contracts with a client. A manufacturer adjusts the requirement of part order for a supplier by reallocating manufacturing operations backwards from the delivery time required by a client. We developed a prototype of simulation system for a three-layered supply chain. We carried out large number of computational experiments by changing experimental conditions and verified the effectiveness of the proposed negotiation method.
%G English
%Z TC 5
%Z WG 5.7
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-04022163/document
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-04022163/file/520759_1_En_68_Chapter.pdf
%L hal-04022163
%U https://inria.hal.science/hal-04022163
%~ IFIP
%~ IFIP-AICT
%~ IFIP-TC
%~ IFIP-TC5
%~ IFIP-WG
%~ IFIP-APMS
%~ IFIP-WG5-7
%~ IFIP-AICT-632