%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Supporting Diverse Customers and Prioritized Traffic in Next-Generation Passive Optical Networks
%+ Department of Computer Science and Engineering
%+ Department of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE)
%A Hoque, Naureen
%A Ramamurthy, Byrav
%Z Part 2: Poster Papers
%< avec comité de lecture
%( Lecture Notes in Computer Science
%B 23th International IFIP Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM)
%C Athens, Greece
%Y Anna Tzanakaki
%Y Manos Varvarigos
%Y Raul Muñoz
%Y Reza Nejabati
%Y Noboru Yoshikane
%Y Markos Anastasopoulos
%Y Johann Marquez-Barja
%I Springer International Publishing
%3 Optical Network Design and Modeling
%V LNCS-11616
%P 645-657
%8 2019-05-13
%D 2019
%R 10.1007/978-3-030-38085-4_55
%K NG-PON2
%K Wavelength allocation
%K Priority
%Z Computer Science [cs]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Networking and Internet Architecture [cs.NI]Conference papers
%X A variety of DBA (Dynamic Bandwidth Allocation) and DWBA (Dynamic Wavelength and Bandwidth Allocation) algorithms have been proposed which are based on different PONs (e.g. EPON, GPON, XG-PON, 10G-EPON, etc.). But to our knowledge, no DWBA scheme for NG-PON2 system, with diverse customers and prioritized traffic, has been proposed yet. In this work, this problem is addressed and we focus on the wavelength assignment part, assuming that the system applies conventional DBA method described in the standard ITU-T G.989. Considering this assumption, we propose five different dynamic wavelength and bandwidth allocation (DWBA) schemes. First, mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models are developed to minimize the total delay of the high priority data. Due to the MILP’s high computational complexity, heuristic algorithms are developed based on the MILP model insights. The five heuristics algorithms are: No Block-Split Heuristic (NBH), Equal Block-Split Heuristic (EBH), Priority Based No Block-Split Heuristic (P-NBH), Priority Based Equal Block-Split Heuristic (P-EBH), and Priority Based Decider Block-Split Heuristic (P-DBH). Six priority classes of requests are introduced with the goal of minimizing the total delay for the high priority data and to lessen the bandwidth wastage of the system. Finally, experiments for the performance evaluation of the five DWBA schemes are conducted. The results show that P-DBH is the most efficient among the five because this scheme offers the lowest delay for high priority data and the minimum bandwidth wastage for lower priority ones.
%G English
%Z TC 6
%Z WG 6.10
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-03200649/document
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-03200649/file/484327_1_En_55_Chapter.pdf
%L hal-03200649
%U https://inria.hal.science/hal-03200649
%~ IFIP-LNCS
%~ IFIP
%~ IFIP-TC
%~ IFIP-WG
%~ IFIP-TC6
%~ IFIP-LNCS-11616
%~ IFIP-ONDM
%~ IFIP-WG6-10