%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Complementary Tools and Techniques for Supporting Fitness-for-Purpose of Interactive Critical Systems
%+ San Jose State University [San Jose] (SJSU)
%+ Interactive Critical Systems (IRIT-ICS)
%+ NASA Ames Research Center (ARC)
%A Billman, Dorrit
%A Fayollas, Camille
%A Feary, Michael
%A Martinie, Célia
%A Palanque, Philippe
%Z Also part of the Programming and Software Engineering book sub series (LNPSE, volume 9856)
%< avec comité de lecture
%( Human-Centered and Error-Resilient Systems Development: IFIP WG 13.2/13.5 Joint Working Conference, 6th International Conference on Human-Centered Software Engineering, HCSE 2016, and 8th International Conference on Human Error, Safety, and System Development, HESSD 2016, Stockholm, Sweden, August 29-31, 2016, Proceedings
%B 6th International Conference on Human-Centred Software Engineering (HCSE 2016) / 8th International Conference on Human Error, Safety (HESSD 2016) and System Development (HESSD)
%C Stockholm, Sweden
%Y Cristian Bogdan
%Y Jan Gulliksen
%Y Stefan Sauer
%Y Peter Forbrig
%Y Marco Winckler
%Y Chris Johnson
%Y Philippe Palanque
%Y Regina Bernhaupt
%Y Filip Kis
%I Springer International Publishing
%3 Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS)
%V 9856
%N Part 4: Human Error and Safety-Critical Systems
%P 181-202
%8 2016-08-29
%D 2016
%R 10.1007/978-3-319-44902-9_12
%K Aviation
%K Safety-critical systems
%K Complementary approaches
%K Interactive systems behavior
%K Work analysis and representation
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Software Engineering [cs.SE]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Embedded Systems
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Cryptography and Security [cs.CR]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Human-Computer Interaction [cs.HC]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Hardware Architecture [cs.AR]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and SimulationConference papers
%X Sound design of complex, interactive, safety critical systems is very important, yet difficult. A particular challenge in the design of safety-critical systems is a typical lack of access to large numbers of testers and an inability to test early designs with traditional usability assessment tools. This inability leads to reduced information available to guide design, a phenomenon referred to as the Collingridge dilemma. Our research proposes to address parts of this problem with the development of tools and techniques for generating useful information and assessing developing designs early, to minimize the need for late change. More generally, we describe a set of three tools and techniques to support the process of ensuring fitness-for-purpose of complex interactive systems, helping designers focus on interaction across different functions of an overall system. These different tools and techniques support different parts of the overall design and evaluation process, but are focused on improving the coverage and effectiveness of evaluating interaction.
%G English
%Z TC 13
%Z WG 13.2
%Z WG 13.5
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-02603527v2/document
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-02603527v2/file/430524_1_En_12_Chapter.pdf
%L hal-02603527
%U https://inria.hal.science/hal-02603527
%~ UNIV-TLSE2
%~ UNIV-TLSE3
%~ CNRS
%~ UT1-CAPITOLE
%~ IFIP-LNCS
%~ IFIP
%~ IFIP-WG
%~ TDS-MACS
%~ IFIP-TC13
%~ IFIP-HCSE
%~ IFIP-WG13-2
%~ IFIP-LNCS-9856
%~ IFIP-HESSD
%~ IFIP-WG13-5
%~ IRIT
%~ IRIT-ICS
%~ IRIT-FSL
%~ IRIT-UT3
%~ TOULOUSE-INP
%~ UNIV-UT3
%~ UT3-INP
%~ UT3-TOULOUSEINP