%0 Conference Proceedings
%T A Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach for Analyzing the Risks and Benefits of Opening Data
%+ Universitas Islam Indonesia
%+ Delft University of Technology (TU Delft)
%+ Aliah University
%+ Catholic University of Leuven = Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven)
%A Luthfi, Ahmad
%A Rehena, Zeenat
%A Janssen, Marijn
%A Crompvoets, Joep
%< avec comité de lecture
%( Lecture Notes in Computer Science
%B 17th Conference on e-Business, e-Services and e-Society (I3E)
%C Kuwait City, Kuwait
%Y Salah A. Al-Sharhan
%Y Antonis C. Simintiras
%Y Yogesh K. Dwivedi
%Y Marijn Janssen
%Y Matti Mäntymäki
%Y Luay Tahat
%Y Issam Moughrabi
%Y Taher M. Ali
%Y Nripendra P. Rana
%I Springer International Publishing
%3 Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era
%V LNCS-11195
%P 397-412
%8 2018-10-30
%D 2018
%R 10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3_36
%K Multi-criteria decision making
%K Fuzzy
%K Analytic hierarchy process
%K Open data
%K Risks
%K Benefits
%Z Computer Science [cs]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Networking and Internet Architecture [cs.NI]Conference papers
%X Governments are releasing their data to the public to accomplish benefits like the creation of transparency, accountability, citizen engagement and to enable business innovation. At the same time, decision-makers are reluctant to open their data due to some potential risks like misuse, sensitivity, ownership, and inaccuracy of the data. The goal of the study presented in this paper is to develop a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making (FMCDM) approach to analyze the risks and benefits to determine the decision to open a dataset. FMCDM is chosen due to its capability to measure and weight the relative importance of the criteria. FMCDM need the weighting of criteria as input. For this Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) is utilized by collecting input from experts’ knowledge and expertise. The scores for each criterion are summed up to rank the importance of the alternatives. Four main criteria are used, e.g. data sensitivity and data ownership representing risks criteria, and data availability and data trustworthy as benefits criteria. For each criterion, there were two sub-criteria identified. Four types of decisions to open data can be made: completely open, maintain suppression, provide limited access, and remain closed. A health patient record dataset is used to illustrate the approach. In further research, we recommend to develop automated approaches that take a dataset as an input and can provide an advice.
%G English
%Z TC 6
%Z WG 6.11
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-02274163/document
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-02274163/file/474698_1_En_36_Chapter.pdf
%L hal-02274163
%U https://inria.hal.science/hal-02274163
%~ IFIP-LNCS
%~ IFIP
%~ IFIP-TC
%~ IFIP-WG
%~ IFIP-TC6
%~ IFIP-WG6-11
%~ IFIP-I3E
%~ IFIP-LNCS-11195