%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Enriching Task Models with Usability and User Experience Evaluation Data
%+ Department of Industrial Design [Eindhoven]
%+ ruwido
%+ Interactive Critical Systems (IRIT-ICS)
%A Bernhaupt, Regina
%A Palanque, Philippe
%A Drouet, Dimitri
%A Martinie, Célia
%< avec comité de lecture
%( Human-Centered Software Engineering: 7th IFIP WG 13.2 International Working Conference, HCSE 2018, Sophia Antipolis, France, September 3–5, 2018, Revised Selected Papers
%B 7th International Conference on Human-Centred Software Engineering (HCSE 2018)
%C Sophia Antipolis, France
%Y Cristian Bogdan
%Y Kati Kuusinen
%Y Marta Kristín Lárusdóttir
%Y Philippe Palanque
%Y Marco Winckler
%I Springer International Publishing
%3 Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)
%V 11262
%N Part 3: Task Modelling and Task-Based Approaches
%P 146-163
%8 2018-09-03
%D 2018
%R 10.1007/978-3-030-05909-5_9
%K User study
%K Usability
%K Task models
%K User experience Evaluation
%K Formal description
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Software Engineering [cs.SE]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Embedded Systems
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Cryptography and Security [cs.CR]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Human-Computer Interaction [cs.HC]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Hardware Architecture [cs.AR]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Modeling and Simulation
%Z Computer Science [cs]Conference papers
%X Evaluation results focusing on usability and user experience are often difficult to be taken into account during an iterative design process. This is due to the fact that evaluation exploits concrete artefacts (prototype or system) while design and development are based on more abstract descriptions such as task models or software models. As concrete data cannot be represented, evaluation results are just discarded. This paper addresses the problem of discrepancy between abstract view of task models and concrete data produced in evaluations by first, describing the requirements for a task modelling notation: (a) representation of data for each individual participant, (b) representation of aggregated data for one evaluation as well as (c) several evaluations and (d) the need to visualize multi-dimensional data from the evaluation as well as the interactive system gathered during runtime. Second: by showing how the requirements were integrated in a task modelling tool. Using an example from an experimental evaluation possible usages of the tool are demonstrated.
%G English
%Z TC 13
%Z WG 13.2
%2 https://hal.science/hal-02089252/document
%2 https://hal.science/hal-02089252/file/bernhaupt_22695.pdf
%L hal-02089252
%U https://hal.science/hal-02089252
%~ UNIV-TLSE2
%~ UNIV-TLSE3
%~ CNRS
%~ LORIA2
%~ SMS
%~ UT1-CAPITOLE
%~ IFIP-LNCS
%~ IFIP
%~ TDS-MACS
%~ IFIP-TC13
%~ IFIP-HCSE
%~ IFIP-WG13-2
%~ IFIP-LNCS-11262
%~ IRIT
%~ IRIT-ICS
%~ IRIT-FSL
%~ IRIT-UT3
%~ TOULOUSE-INP
%~ UNIV-UT3
%~ UT3-INP
%~ UT3-TOULOUSEINP
%~ SITE-WEB-MODELE-1
%~ SITE-WEB-MODELE-2
%~ SITE-WEB-MODELE-3
%~ SITE-WEB-MODELE-4