%0 Conference Proceedings
%T E-Participation and E-Government Maturity: A Global Perspective
%+ National University of Singapore (NUS)
%A Krishnan, Satish
%A Teo, Thompson, H.
%A Lim, John
%Z Part 5: IT in the Public Sector
%< avec comité de lecture
%( IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology
%B InternationalWorking Conference on Transfer and Diffusion of IT (TDIT)
%C Bangalore, India
%Y Yogesh K. Dwivedi
%Y Helle Zinner Henriksen
%Y David Wastell
%Y Rahul De’
%I Springer
%3 Grand Successes and Failures in IT. Public and Private Sectors
%V AICT-402
%P 420-435
%8 2013-06-27
%D 2013
%R 10.1007/978-3-642-38862-0_26
%K ICT infrastructure
%K human capital
%K governance
%K e-participation
%K egovernment maturity
%Z Computer Science [cs]
%Z Humanities and Social Sciences/Library and information sciencesConference papers
%X Utilizing the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) theory and the literature on citizen engagement (or participation), we formulated a multiple-mediation model, examining (1) the contextual antecedents of e-participation and e-government maturity; and (2) the mediating role of e-participation (in form of e-information sharing, e-consultation, and e-decision-making) on the relationships between the TOE contextual factors and e-government maturity. Based on archival data from 187 countries, our results showed that ICT infrastructure, human capital and e-participation had a direct relationship with e-government maturity. Of the three dimensions of e-participation, e-information sharing and e-decision-making were positively associated with e-government maturity, and e-consultation was negatively related. Further, all three dimensions of e-participation partially mediated the influence of ICT infrastructure and human capital on e-government maturity. Results also indicated that governance in a country did not significantly contribute to its e-government maturity, and their relationship was not mediated by e-participation. Our findings contribute to the theoretical discourse on e-government by identifying the contextual factors affecting e-government maturity, and provide indications to practice on enhancing government’s willingness in implementing relevant e-participation initiatives.
%G English
%Z TC 8
%Z WG 8.6
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-01467794/document
%2 https://inria.hal.science/hal-01467794/file/978-3-642-38862-0_26_Chapter.pdf
%L hal-01467794
%U https://inria.hal.science/hal-01467794
%~ SHS
%~ IFIP
%~ IFIP-AICT
%~ IFIP-TC
%~ IFIP-WG
%~ IFIP-TC8
%~ IFIP-TDIT
%~ IFIP-WG8-6
%~ IFIP-AICT-402