%0 Conference Proceedings
%T Schengen Routing: A Compliance Analysis
%+ Universität Zürich [Zürich] = University of Zurich (UZH)
%A Dönni, Daniel
%A Machado, Guilherme, Sperb
%A Tsiaras, Christos
%A Stiller, Burkhard
%Z Part 3: Security, Privacy, and Measurements
%< avec comité de lecture
%( Lecture Notes in Computer Science
%B 9th Autonomous Infrastructure, Management, and Security (AIMS)
%C Ghent, Belgium
%Y Steven Latré
%Y Marinos Charalambides
%Y Jérôme François
%Y Corinna Schmitt
%Y Burkhard Stiller
%I Springer
%3 Intelligent Mechanisms for Network Configuration and Security
%V LNCS-9122
%P 100-112
%8 2015-06-22
%D 2015
%R 10.1007/978-3-319-20034-7_11
%K Schengen Routing
%K Geo-location
%K Compliance checks
%Z Computer Science [cs]
%Z Computer Science [cs]/Networking and Internet Architecture [cs.NI]Conference papers
%X Schengen Routing was proposed as a countermeasure to traffic monitoring activities practiced by intelligence agencies. This work here presents the results of a larger-scale measurement performed to quantify Schengen Routing compliance in today’s Internet. Based on 3388 TCP, UDP, and ICMP traceroute measurements executed from RIPE Atlas probes located in over 1100 different Autonomous Systems (AS) in the Schengen Area, it was found that 34.5% to 39.7% of these routes are Schengen-compliant, while compliance levels vary from 0% to 80% among countries. Finally, an approach was developed that allows end-users to determine whether a specific route to a host is Schengen-compliant or not.
%G English
%Z TC 6
%Z WG 6.6
%2 https://hal.science/hal-01410156/document
%2 https://hal.science/hal-01410156/file/978-3-319-20034-7_11_Chapter.pdf
%L hal-01410156
%U https://hal.science/hal-01410156
%~ IFIP-LNCS
%~ IFIP
%~ IFIP-TC
%~ IFIP-TC6
%~ IFIP-AIMS
%~ IFIP-WG6-6
%~ IFIP-LNCS-9122