Ternary Dialectical Informatics - Perspectives on Soviet and Russian Computing
Conference Papers Year : 2011

Ternary Dialectical Informatics

Abstract

Modern binary informatics with its so-called “classical” two-valued logic admits to create an artificial intellect and suppresses the natural intellect of students and other thinking people. Logic that based on dogmatic law of the excluded middle is incompatible with dialectical principle of opposition coexistence. Such logic is deprived of fundamental logical relation – the content consequence, and then cannot reach a conclusion. Aristotle’s syllogistics includes the content consequence as common affirmative premise “All x are y”. However, binarity misinterprets it as a paradoxical material implication that is not a relation at all. Lewis Carroll’s “Symbolic logic” correctly represented syllogistics, but it is not intelligible for modern binary logic. Our paper reveals the essence of content consequence; it explains Carroll’s intentional judgments and syllogistic relations submitted to opposite coexistence.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
978-3-642-22816-2_11_Chapter.pdf (175.55 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

hal-01568386 , version 1 (25-07-2017)

Licence

Identifiers

Cite

Nikolay Petrovich Brusentsov, Julia Sergeevna Vladimirova. Ternary Dialectical Informatics. 1st Soviet and Russian Computing (SoRuCom), Jul 2006, Petrozavodsk, Russia. pp.81-88, ⟨10.1007/978-3-642-22816-2_11⟩. ⟨hal-01568386⟩
65 View
114 Download

Altmetric

Share

More